Friday, September 5, 2008

Liberia: You're Right Mr. President, But... - AllAfrica.com

U.S. president George Shrub gets in the state today at the caput of a high-power U.S. deputation to stop a five-leg circuit of Africa. We welcome him with the hope that he is here to do a particular lawsuit for Republic Of Republic Of Liberia vis-à-vis his place prior to coming.

He will be the peak U.S. leader to see Liberia for decennaries since President Jimmy Howard Carter sometime in the late 1970s. The President's visit to Benin, Tanzania, Rwanda, and Republic Of Ghana had raised hopes and there is no inquiry that it will raise even larger hopes in Liberia. The simple ground is that having locked itself in decennaries of ferocious civil warfare that proverb monolithic death, devastation of basic substructures and establishments and prompted monolithic encephalon drain, the country's economic system is in tatters. More than that, the state stays insecure and the nation's estimated three million population stay despairing for aid even with the presence of a robust international peacekeeping military unit and attempts by the U.S. and its allies revitalize the economy.

IT IS AGAINST this background plus more than that the U.S. President, unlike his predecessors who attempted to work out Liberia's jobs from a distance of disaffection, is visiting this Africa's oldest democracy that throws particular historical neckties to the U.S. and beholds it as its mentor. Unfortunately, the President may make very small for this hopeful population if we judge his visit from the warning he gave in his Valentine's Day computer address last Thursday in Washington. The President declared paternalism over! He then accused states that are trying to do available grants for Liberia's post-war development of "exploiting the continent's resources or irresponsibly offering assistance as charity". Finally, he hit place the point that possibly put the docket for his visit to Liberia: "America is serving as an investor, not as a donor." In other words, he have come up to state to the authorities and people of Republic Of Republic Of Liberia that the policy of restricting the freedom and duties of subsidiaries or dependants in their supposed best involvement no longer throws H2O in U.S.-Liberia relations. This also means, inch our view, that Liberia's best argument, which is that it was founded by U.S. philanthropists, sided with the U.S. in its way to greatness, and therefore rates that nation's particular favour and attending specifically during this clip of crisis and path-finding, hold's no H2O also!

BUT THE president did not bury to be a small spot ambiguous, perhaps for political reason: he remained emphatic that the United States still have a moral imperative mood and a critical security involvement in helping Africa defeat disease, poorness and instability. It is where the leader of the world's most functional economic system and democracy saw the necessity to stress America's moral imperative mood and critical security involvement that we derive a lawsuit for hope for Liberia.

WE AGREE THAT paternalism have outlived its utility especially where it aided marionettes and autocrats across Africa during the Cold War old age to stamp down and oppress its people into abject want and poverty. We also back up the United States' demand for "clear consequences for the millions of taxpayer dollars it directs to Africa". We salutation the state for revolutionizing the manner it nears development to Africa. This is because we understand the President's statement that "Too many states go on to follow either the paternalistic impression that handles African states as charity cases, or a theoretical account of development that seeks only to purchase up their resources. United States rejects both approaches." We therefore welcome the U.S. committedness to treating African leadership as equal spouses who must put clear ends and accomplish mensurable results.

BUT WE privation to remind the President that the equations and concretion of development and foreign assistance that inevitably fatten only the business relationships of the moneymen in development partnerships in Africa will not throw in the lawsuit of Liberia, if peace, justice, and stableness is America's wishing for Liberia. First, because the Republic Of Liberia have enormous, pressing economical and security necessitates that the United States cannot possibly divorcement from its avowed moral imperative mood and a critical security interest. With the nation's logging, mineral, and India rubber industries just freed from U.N. countenances to confront extended technical reappraisals and alteration of concessioner understandings some of which are shrouded in power-keg controversies, the niceties of Bush's new business-front attack will be a extravagance for Liberia. It is a extravagance that despairing Liberians will run out of forbearance waiting for. And holds are too unsafe for Liberia.

Relevant Links

WE ARE REMINDED that warfare that rocked the foundation of this democracy for more than that two decennaries is a warfare to convey the ends and aspirations of Liberians within hope's reach. President Shrub did not travel far from this world when, in mention to Zimbabwe's security problem, he said, "These are great security challenges, but there is even greater cause for hope." It is our hope that the U.S. leader will apparent that hope by taking a critical expression at Liberia's security because wicked makes not travel away simply because beleaguered authorities and their international spouses will it so. It makes when work force and women of committedness and madcap courageousness to salvage world - phone call that paternalism if you will -stand up and prehend the reign of panic at the minute of hope and expectation. For President Bush, it's now or never.

IT IS THEREFORE our hope that President Shrub will widen that hope to the billions of displaced Liberians who have got got nowhere to go back to; to the road-locked territories outside Monrovia, to the deprived population of Liberian Capital that misses everything from save-drinking H2O to power, and to billions of women, children, and the aged that have no entree to sound and low-cost wellness and education. The President's Malaria Program is a good lawsuit that may be expanded by supporting the Liberian government's wellness programme and interim poorness decrease strategy.

STAY AND DISCUSS well, Mr. President.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Voinovich: Let next president seal Iraq deal

U.S. Sen. Saint George Voinovich (R., Ohio) yesterday released a missive he wrote asking President Shrub not to seek to negociate a new understanding with Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Iraq that legally perpetrates the adjacent president to defending Iraq against internal and foreign aggressors.


Mr. Voinovich, who have got called for more than than focusing on ending the U.S. presence in Iraq, said he cognizes an understanding is needed to supply a legal footing for U.S. armed forces personnel to be in Iraq after the U.N. authorization runs out Dec. 31.


But he said any understanding committing the United States to providing security in Iraq against future internal and external aggression will necessitate congressional approval, which is not likely to be given before Mr. Bush's term ends.


He said the President should see inking an interim agreement.


"We necessitate to manus over more control to the Iraki people, so that we can convey our ain military personnel place and reconstruct the wellness of our military," Mr. Voinovich wrote.


"I am concerned that this understanding makes not back up that goal."


Mr. Voinovich's phone call for ending the U.S. armed armed combat function in Iraq sets him at likelihood with Republican presidential campaigner Toilet McCain, who back ups retaining U.S. combat military units until the Iraki authorities is stabilized, and with no deadline for full withdrawal.


The Democratic presumptive presidential nominee, Barack Obama, have called for backdown of all U.S. military units within 16 calendar months and have vowed to stop the warfare in 2009.


The United States invaded Iraq in 2003 to throw out Saddam Husain and still have about 150,000 military personnel in the country.


Iraqi functionaries said yesterday that they are committed to meeting a deadline for a long-term security treaty with the United States.


An Iraki authorities statement said Foreign Curate Hoshiyar Zebari had discussed with U.S. Frailty President Dick Cheney in American Capital on Tuesday "the demand to conclude" the long-term strategical model agreement.


That came just years after Iraki Prime Curate Nouri al-Maliki said negotiation on the security treaty were at a deadlock because of U.S. demands that encroached on Iraq's sovereignty.


One U.S. demand, however, have been taken off the table, according to a senior U.S. military functionary in Washington.


That official, speaking on status of anonymity, said the Shrub Administration is no longer seeking legal unsusceptibility for private contractors working in Iraq.


Such unsusceptibility presented a distressing prospect for many Iraqis who see the contractors as a security military unit that runs with small accountability.


The negotiation have sparked heated up argument both in Iraq and the United States, where Democratic lawmakers fear any understanding could lock the military into a long-term presence in Iraq and bind the custody of the adjacent U.S. president.


Information from Reuters was used in this report.

recent RELATED ARTICLES


• |
06/19/2008


• |
06/19/2008


• |
06/18/2008


• |
06/17/2008


• |
06/16/2008


• |
06/09/2008


• |
06/04/2008


• |
06/02/2008


• |
05/27/2008


• |
05/21/2008


• |
05/20/2008


• |
05/20/2008


• |
05/20/2008


• |
05/14/2008


• |
05/05/2008

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, April 11, 2008

US president, first lady had $923,807 (€583,470) income, pay $221,635 (€139,980) federal taxes

: President Saint George W. Shrub and his wife, Laura, paid $221,635 (€139,980) in federal taxations on an adjusted gross income of $923,807 (€583,470) for 2007.

The income sum includes a $150,000 (€94,740) progress received by Laura Shrub for the children's book she co-authored with her daughter, Jenna.

Adjusted gross income is salary, dividends, involvement and other nonexempt income minus specified points that are exempt from federal taxation.

Last year, the president and Mrs. Shrub paid $186,378 (€117,715) in federal taxations on their income of $765,801 (€483,675).

Bush's wage as president is about $400,000 (€252,635). Today in Americas

Also Friday, the White Person House reported that Frailty President Dick Cheney and his wife, Lynne, had an adjusted gross income of $3.04 million (€1.9 million) in 2007.

The Cheneys owed $602,651 (€380,630) in federal taxations on that income. They have got paid $466,165 (€294,425) through withholdings and estimated taxation payments, and will pay the remaining $136,486 (€86,205) upon filing their taxation return.

The Cheneys' income includes the frailty president's wage and a pension he acquires as a former manager of Union Pacific Ocean Corp. It also includes Lynne Cheney's book royalty income, a wage from her work at the American Enterprise Institute and a pension she acquires as a former manager of Reader's Digest.

The frailty president's wage is about $212,000 (€133,895).

Mrs. Shrub donated all nett return from her book progress to Teach for United States and The New Teacher Project, according to the White Person House.

The Bushes contributed $165,660 (€104,630) to Christian churches and charitable organizations, including the military volunteer fire section in Crawford, Texas, where they have a ranch. The Cheneys donated $166,547 (€105,190) to charity in 2007, the White Person House said.

Labels: , , , , ,